The articles and opinions on the TEPAV website are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official views of TEPAV.
© TEPAV, all rights reserved unless otherwise stated.
Söğütözü Cad. No:43 TOBB-ETÜ Campus, Section 2, 06560 Söğütözü-Ankara
Phone: +90 312 292 5500Fax: +90 312 292 5555
tepav@tepav.org.tr / tepav.org.trTEPAV is a non-profit, non-partisan research institution that contributes to the policy design process through data-driven analysis, adhering to academic ethics and quality without compromise.
Ever more of us nowadays think that the crisis in Europe has shaken the foundations of Turkey’s European Union (EU) project. Looking at the acceleration of the trade figures between Turkey, the Middle East, and North Africa, some get caught up in the notion that the region might be an alternative to the EU as a partner for Turkey. I personally feel sorry for those who think that the EU is breaking down and that Turkey has an alternative. I have always thought that the EU was the only thing that could transform Turkey positively in the twenty-first century, just as the Republican project transformed it in the twentieth. This idea of has been strengthened lately.
I do not intend to enumerate the benefits of the EU. I merely want to remind those who seem to have forgotten of the biggest one: The EU is the most important convergence machine ever developed. That is, it is a mechanism that turns middle income countries, just like Turkey, into high income ones, without letting them get caught in the middle-income trap, which is Turkey’s main risk. To this day, 200 million people from Southern and Central Europe have benefited from it.[1] Moreover, the EU is the only region that enables growth for high-current account deficit countries. Capital within the EU flows from rich but low-growth countries towards those with stronger growth prospects. It gives lower income countries the opportunity to access the markets and capital of rich countries. The main cause of the European crisis per se has to do with how these low-income countries used the capital they accessed: in productive areas stimulating growth, or in non-growth areas.
I think Turkey has failed to build the ability to exploit the EU in areas stimulating productivity. There are three areas which I think will improve the level of productivity and prosperity in Turkey and constitute the backbone of the country’s new growth story: education, justice and infrastructure. If utilized well in these areas, the EU project can turn Turkey into a more prosperous, just and livable country.
Firm steps in these three areas will directly enable productivity gains. Not only will this contribute to Turkey’s new growth story, but also attract at lower costs the foreign savings we dearly need.
Do you think we should give up hopes on the EU just because of the negative attitudes of a handful of European politicians? Does a country that can save only 13 percent of what it earns have any other option than to invest? If you can think of any, please let me know.
[1] If you are skeptical about the EU, please take a look at the following report by the World Bank: “Golden Growth: Restoring the Luster of the European Economic Model” http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/ECAEXT/0,,contentMDK:23074045~pagePK:146736~piPK:146830~theSitePK:258599,00.html
[2] You might check the following notes and multimedia for further insight on the issue: http://www.tepav.org.tr/en/haberler/s/1805, http://www.tepav.org.tr/en/haberler/s/2537; http://www.tepav.org.tr/tr/haberler/s/371 (Turkish); https://tepav.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/upload/files/haber/1330704312-2.NTV.wmv (Turkish)
[3] The latest data is for 2007 by the OECD. (Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators - 2010 Edition)
[4] http://www.tepav.org.tr/en/kose-yazisi-tepav/s/2842
[5] http://www.coe.int/T/dghl/cooperation/cepej/default_en.asp
[6] It is not that university student but the people who assigned her the job to blame: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ2bQuRPaCs (Turkish)
[7] Or electors, you can say.
[8] I do not want to accept that our administrators are of the view, “let man take care of the family and Istanbul take care of the economy.”
*Esen Çağlar, TEPAV Economic Policy Analyst, http://www.tepav.org.tr/tr/ekibimiz/s/25/Esen+Caglar
N. Murat Ersavcı
10/12/2024
N. Murat Ersavcı
27/03/2024
N. Murat Ersavcı
07/12/2022
N. Murat Ersavcı
06/03/2022
Güven Sak, PhD
26/01/2022